The following considerations though
refer to my personal life it can easily be extended to any
researcher. An architect who is studying the best way to build a
palace, an engineer who trying to improve the efficiency of an
engine, an electronic expert who studying a new lighting system ....
During the years I gained knowledge on
how to formulate blends and compounds based on thermoplastic
polymers. My business took me to meet many such polymers PE, PP, ABS,
PC, PS, PA6, PA66, PBAT, PBS, PHA, PLA ... and many additives eg
antioxidants, light stabilizers, slip, release agents, mineral
fillers, glass fibers, carbon fibers, wood fibers ....
I have always regretted myself feeling
inadequate my knowledge on various materials as a result of the fact
that over time I kept changing polymer, additive, reference ..... and
never having the opportunity to specialize myself on a particular
topic. In the past I thought to this point as my big problem, until I
did not become aware of the fact, that I do not need to know
"everything" on a particular subject but it is enough to
have the mental resources to go to fill the holes when this becomes
necessary.
Therefore, if at a certain time of
life, I need to make some products based on PP, I am able to know
what are the parameters I must to know and where to look. The melting
point, the crystallization point, the resistance to the impact, the
flexural modulus ... etc.
Sure I constantly repeating to myself
that I have never achieved the specialization in a particular topic
and I am never be able to have complete knowledge in any area. But
this is precisely the fundamental error, even spending years and
years to studying and working on a particular polymer, or on a
particular class of additives, nobody will never be able to have
access to all the knowledge on that particular subject. This also
because even as I write these few lines thousands of people continue
to study and to expand our own knowledge in the field in which I
would like to know everything.
Now seems to be unavoidable the use of
big computers that are able to read and analyze thousands of article,
books, magazines in near real time and thanks to the development of
artificial intelligence are also able to propose solutions or make
accurate predictions.
But even these monsters of knowledge
have their weak point: the need to constantly acquire new knowledge
made available by thousands of researchers around the world continue
to produce articles, books etc.
I often wondered to myself what will be
my future work (and what will be the work of thousands of others
researches like). If between 15-20 years we will be supplanted by
super computers. If companies will need simply to subscribe for
access to a super computer (like Watson) and do without all those
thousands of researchers, developers, who by their silent work
continue to make improvements (often small) to all materials,
medicines, objects that surround us and with whom we come into
contact every day.
I'd like to know your opinion on this
topic, as always I leave you the link to my EMAIL .